tourbar.gif (4675 bytes)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

            

                

 
  Photographing the Aurora  (Continued)
   
 

The Relative Effectiveness of Camera Lenses
                                                           (as published in Sky & Telescope Magazine)
   
 

Back to Alaska Welcome Page    Previous Page
 
     
  Exposure is only part of the requirement for pleasing auroral pictures. It is always best to have an interesting foreground and a nice star background, so as to give a sense of scale. In particular, a brilliant star background greatly enhances auroral photographs, particularly if the stars are not trailed. So it is well to understand that star exposures do not depend on the f/number of the lens used but rather on the effective aperture of the lens, which is given by the focal length divided by the f/number.

The table below shows the relative effectiveness at capturing auroras and stars of some lenses that might be
   
Bands have continuous but irregular lower edges characterized by kinks or folds. Click on the image for a larger view. 
Courtesy Jay Brausch.
 		  
   
 

used for auroral photography. The 50-mm, f/1.0 lens has been used as a point of reference. The table shows a little-appreciated fact: although wide-angle lenses may give a good sense of auroral scale, they are very inefficient at recording stars. The longer-focal-length lenses often provide much better star fields. Balancing field of view, exposure time, and the richness of the star field is the challenge of auroral photography.

 
 

Relative Effectiveness of Camera
Lenses for Aurora Photography

Focal length
(mm)

f/number
for auroras

Effectiveness
for stars

Effectiveness

Stars/aurora
ratio

         
24 1.4 0.50 0.12 0.24
35 1.4 0.50 0.25 0.50
50 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00
50 1.2 0.70 0.70 1.00
50 1.4 0.50 0.50 1.00
85 1.2 0.70 2.00 2.85
100 2.0 0.25 1.00 4.00
100 2.8 0.125 0.50 4.00
         
 
  A final factor to consider is contrast of the aurora in the sky. Moonlight will diminish contrast; a Moon with up to 25 percent illumination gives pleasing results, as the light illuminates the landscape without brightening the sky enough to degrade auroral contrast. However, once the Moon is half lit, auroral contrast will begin to suffer. Auroral photographs taken near full Moon will be very washed out except in the case of extremely bright auroras.
   
  Robert Eather has researched auroral physics for 25 years and is the author of Majestic Lights: The Aurora in Science, History, and the Arts. His pioneering auroral cinematography is featured in Solar Max, an IMAX®-format film released in 2000.
 
  Back to Top
   
      
   
 

To view this article on the Sky & Telescope Web site, PRESS HERE
Note:  The Web Site will open in a New Window, to return here, just close the newly opened window.
 
  Copyright  2002 TravelQuest International.  All rights reserved.
 Copyright  2002 Sky Publishing Corp.
Revised: October 25, 2005.
Information in this document is subject to change without notice.
Other products and companies referred to herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or trademark holders.